Archive for the ‘Search Engine Marketing (SEM)’ Category

12 Things You Should Be Doing For Localised SEO

Tuesday, May 15th, 2012

 

Local search results have been around for many years now, but with each new update rolled out by Google, either announced or unannounced, the need to optimise for local search results is increasingly important.

But whilst there is plenty of information and advice on how to optimise your website or your marketing for the search engines, the focus on localisation is often rather vague. In fact I have come across several examples recently of people recommending a form of SEO localisation which amounts to little more than either translating text verbatim, or using boilerplate text.

If the recent algorithmic updates released by Google over the past few months have demonstrated anything, it is that tactics such as these are likely only to result in your website being severely disadvantaged.

So if optimising for local results is important for your business, what techniques should you be implementing in order to have the best chance of both appearing high up the relevant search results for your local area, as well as remaining on Google’s good side? Here are 12 tips for localised search engine optimisation.

12 Things You Should Be Doing For Localised SEO

1. Domain Name

Naturally if your website is already established then it may be too late to think about choosing a suitable domain name. However, if you are looking at setting up a local business presence or a new website presence then this is definitely the first step toward optimising for localised results.

If your domain they can include the area or town relevant to your business then clearly this is going to help stand out as a relevant local result. Remember, if buying a domain name which includes multiple words, one of which may be a town, use hyphens rather than underscores as this will be more accurately interpreted by Google when identifying local place names. Just be sure not to use more than two hyphens and don’t spam!

2. Domain Extension

Again, if your business is already established then this won’t be as easy to change, but if possible it is always preferable to make sure that your website domain extension is as localised as possible. So if your business is based in the UK, having a .co.uk extension is better than having a .com extension.

3. Web Host Location

There is some evidence to suggest that Google takes into account the physical location of your website’s host server. So if your business is based in the UK, it may be of some help to have your website hosted in the UK as well. Google has not released any specific word on this matter, and opinion is divided. However there are many major players who swear adamantly that their.co.uk websites hosted in the UK perform better than .co.uk websites hosted elsewhere, such as in the United States.

4. Address In The Footer

It is extremely important to make sure that your business’s postal address is included in the footer section of every single page within your website. Doing this significantly enhances your local relevance as far as Google is concerned.

5. Local Directions

On your contact page, in addition to your postal address and a map, include some text which provides local directions. Inevitably you will be including various place names and town names, as well as road names, carriageways and motorways.

6. Register On Google Maps

This is one of the most important points in this blog. I cannot emphasise enough how crucial it is in terms of localised SEO to make sure that your business is registered on Google Places. When people search specifically for a local business, those businesses which have registered on Google Places will be listed at the very top of the page, above the organic search results, often with a map displayed on the right-hand side which clearly indicates your business’s geographic location. This is better than having a sponsored listing, and it doesn’t cost anything. Visit https://accounts.google.com/ServiceLogin?service=lbc and make sure you get your business registered as soon as possible.

7. Local Events And Community Issues

If possible try to include a page or section within your site which focuses on local events or any community related issues connected with your line of business. Most businesses will have at least some connection to the local community. If not, perhaps it might be worth establishing some sort of connection, even if it is minor sponsorship of a local charity event. This is perhaps a little cynical, but there are almost certainly issues and events which you can write about which will demonstrate to Google that your business really is local and relevant.

8. Local Directories

As well as making sure that your website is submitted to major online search directories, also make sure that you submit your site to local directories. Some of the major directories such as Yelp and Thomson Local will enable your business to demonstrate a local presence, but there are also opportunities such as those run by the local Chamber Of Commerce which allow your business to be listed alongside other businesses in the area.

9. Use Of Language And Words

One of the biggest mistakes many businesses make when contracting a copywriter or SEO specialist to market their site is to hire the services of someone who is not local to the UK. Inevitably this means that the language, use of language, vocabulary and spellings do not conform to local UK styles. Even looking at the word ‘localised’ it is immediately apparent whether this is to do with the UK or the US simply because of the fact that it is spelt with the letter ‘s’ rather than a ‘z’.

But simply translating text is not enough. The way in which British writers write is inevitably unique, and cannot be replicated merely through translation or the correction of spellings. But it goes even further than this, because in many parts of the country there will be specific ways in which things are described, including local vocabulary. So whereas one website might be talking about an alley at the back of a property, a writer based in East Yorkshire may be more likely to talk about a “10 foot” at the back of a property.

So using UK writers who specialise in writing using British English rather than American English, and by using words or vocabulary specific to the region you can significantly improve your website’s apparent relevance as far as Google is concerned.

10. Images And Alt Text

There are two benefits to including images of local places and locations within the pages of your website. If you have ever experimented with Google’s image recognition tool you will be aware of the fact that it is apparent Google is able to roughly identify images of some locations and features. Whether or not this provides any measurable advantage in terms of localised optimisation is unclear at this stage. Certainly Google has not published any information on it, but there are a few experts experimenting with the idea, and some at least claim results which could prove that in some cases it may be of benefit.

But the second and perhaps more obvious advantage is the fact that having pictures of local places also enables you to include captions, filenames, image titles and alt text which emphasise the fact that the business is directly connected to these known locations. Of course from the point of view of real potential customers visiting the website, photographs of the local area also help to foster a feeling of confidence that the business really is local and relevant.

11. Twitter And RSS Feeds

We certainly do know now that Google is paying much more attention to social media such as Twitter. It may be useful therefore as a small aside to embed a Twitter feed on your site which highlights local events and news. This Twitter feed could include headlines from the local paper or radio, as well as information regarding events run by local museums, galleries and the town council. Don’t overdo it, but if used sparingly and sensibly could well improve the localisation of your businesses website.

12. Avoid Boilerplate Text Or Spun Text

Far too many businesses seem to feel that if they have a business website which needs to provide a number of localised presences across the UK that it is acceptable either to have a page or section within the site specific to each location, or to have a sub domain specific to each location. By itself this isn’t wrong, but the way it is implemented almost inevitably means that boilerplate text is used, with great swathes of text duplicated over and over again with only minor changes, such as the place name.

Similarly, spinning text so that on each page the town name and one of two local details are changed will almost certainly mean that following the recent Penguin update Google will penalise your site quite severely. There is simply no shortcut to creating unique, custom and original local content written specifically for each geographic location.

Do you optimise for local search results? Have you found some methods work better than others? What do you do in order to maximise your business’s visibility for local searches? Please leave any comments, thoughts or questions below.

 

Image Credit: http://www.seo-creative.co.uk

 

Quick SEO Tip: Understanding The First Link Priority Rule

Friday, May 11th, 2012

Understanding The First Link Counts Rule

Have you heard of the ‘First Link Priority Rule’? It is a rule which has been around for quite a while now, but from what I’ve seen recently a worrying number of web developers and SEO’s still seem to be largely oblivious. I thought it would be worthwhile to quickly run through what it’s all about.

The rule states that Google will only count the first instance of an anchor text link on a page. So if you include a link in your main navigation menu for which the anchor link text is “spinach juicer”, and then linked to the same page within the body content using ‘vegetable juicer’, then only the anchor text “spinach juicer” would be associated to the target webpage.

There are two exceptions to this rule. If you include two links on a page which both point to the same URL, and one of them is a text link, and one a graphical link, Google will typically only pay attention to the text link, regardless of which appears first on the page.

The second exception is that if you have two text links on the page pointing to the same URL and one of them is a ‘no follow‘ link you may find that both links are ignored.

So the simplest message here is that you should always optimise the first instance of anchor text for each URL. It is easy to forget that sometimes you may have links in your main navigation bar, your footer and within the text itself.

Quick Anchor Text Link Tips;

  • Optimise the first instance of the anchor text link.
  • Vary the anchor text you use to link to a specific page – Consider using branded and partial anchor text links.
  • Only link to a page if it seems natural and offers a purpose to the visitor.
  • Text Links in sidebars and footers offer little value.

 

If you are still not clear on the First Link Priority Rule, or need further clarification, please leave your messages below and we will endeavour to respond as quickly as possible.

 

Image Credit: joshauriemma.com

8 Algorithmic Changes Google Slipped Past You During April

Tuesday, May 8th, 2012


A couple of days ago Google released a list summarising 52 changes which they implemented during April which are now affecting search results.
This has nothing whatsoever to do with penguins, pandas, or indeed any other monochromatic animal. These are just simply run-of-the-mill algorithmic changes which have been implemented without any formal announcement.

I have carefully gone through this comprehensive list of changes and have identified 8 which I believe offer some value to those of us who take a keen interest in our site’s performance and optimisation. In today’s blog post I’m going to go through those 8 points, explaining briefly what the changes are that Google has introduced, and what the implications are for online marketers, as well as offering relevant advice to those who wish to adapt their strategies.

8 Algorithmic Changes Google Slipped Past You During April

1. Paginated Documents

If you have a very long document in your website, perhaps a tutorial, or in-depth guide, you may find that rather than serving this on a single rather bloated page you paginate it. This means splitting the documents across multiple pages, including navigational links which allow the reader to move forwards or backwards through the document.

What Google has identified is that in some cases highly optimised paginated documents can end up dominating some search results. So if you have a tutorial on left-handed bath plugs which has been divided across 10 different pages, it is possible that anybody searching for left-handed bath plugs would find that the first 10 results, in other words the whole of the first page, only lists the 10 different pages of your tutorial.

Clearly this would be good news for you, less so for anybody else trying to deliver relevant or useful information. Certainly from Google’s point of view it is not ideal to serve results which include such a poor level of diversity. Their algorithmic change means that searches will now generate a more diverse selection of results in such cases.

So the message here is that if you have been investing a great deal of time in deliberately splitting up documentation across multiple pages in order to have multiple chances at having those pages listed in the results, this may be time wasted. Unless the document is so long that it deserves to be divided up across multiple pages it may be more advisable to have more quality content per page.

2. Individual Webpage Localisation

We all know that for some time now Google has been serving results which it believes are likely to be more relevant based on localisation. So if you’re searching for information related to train timetables it is more likely that you will receive results which are either predominantly for your country, or possibly even more local than that.

However, what Google has tended to do in the past is to assess the localisation of a website at the domain level, or at most, sub-domain level. This isn’t always ideal, and what they are now doing is to assess individual pages for localisation in cases where content is at least in part user generated. So if you have a web page within your site which includes user generated content which may be specific to a particular town or country, this page may be assessed differently from other pages within your domain, or indeed different from the entire rest of the domain.

I have mentioned in previous blog posts the importance of optimising for localisation, and I think that whilst this algorithmic change may not affect a wide number of business websites, it does underline the importance of making sure that such opportunities are taken advantage of as fully as possible.

3. Domain Diversity

Google is aware that sometimes searches can result in a high number of listings appearing from the same domain. This is less likely to happen now though, as they have made algorithmic changes which should see a more diverse set of domains served for each search. Clearly this means that if you have been seeing your website listed multiple times within the first page for any particular query, you could find that you are now only appearing once. Don’t take this as a warning that you are losing your rank, since it is simply likely that you are being affected by this change.

Perhaps the message here is that it is now more important than ever not to rely on appearing multiple times within search results, but making sure that the listing you do have is optimised for the user as much as possible. I’m talking here about making sure you have highly relevant and appealing titles, as well as descriptive text or rich text snippets.

4. Text Snippets

On the subject of rich text snippets, or at least text snippets, a change implemented during April means that it is more probable now that Google will be taking text snippets from the beginning of your page rather than elsewhere. Although I would not go as far as to suggest that this means you focus more on the text at the beginning of your page than at the end, it is perhaps important to think about getting those soundbites and key messages early on in each page.

5. Fresh Content

We all know that Google is very keen to promote content which is fresh, relevant and up-to-date, and a minor algorithmic change they made during April means that the search results are more likely to prioritise content which appears to be fresh. I have been writing quite a bit recently about the fact that it is now more important than ever to make sure that the content on your website, and in your blog, is regularly added to, expanded and updated. This change simply underlines the importance of having fresh, relevant content on your site as often as possible, even if only to hold on to your search results page position.

Google wants quality content sign6. Quality Content

This is perhaps a warning from Google in case you feel that simply adding any old content will count as fresh content. They are introducing a modification to a classifier they use to promote fresh content. This modification does not simply prioritise high-quality fresh content, but actually excludes fresh content which has been identified as being low quality.

Just make sure you saw the word ‘excludes’ in that last sentence. Yes, it is now vital that you ensure your website is regularly packed full of fresh, original content, but sticking any old rubbish in there is not just going to be a waste of time and money, but could well see your content being actively excluded.

7. Query Interpretation

I was amazed when I read this line from Google. In one very buried, very brief sentence Google has basically said that it is now likely to adapt and respond to your queries based on the most recent searches you have carried out. Effectively I see this as being the case that Google will be monitoring the sort of thing you are looking for, and use this to predict what you might be wanting in subsequent searches.

I don’t think this particularly means that in terms of SEO we could, or should, be doing anything different. But it is important to be aware of the fact that when you are searching on Google it is possible that the results you see for identical searches may change based on interim searches you have carried out. I haven’t carried out any specific testing on this, but it’s certainly worth bearing in mind that it is a possibility, especially when looking to assess either your own site’s or your clients’ sites’ ranking.

8. Concise And Informative Titles

Again, I have mentioned the importance of good quality titles in previous blog posts, but a change implemented by Google during April seems to mean that they are now looking at a wider range of factors when determining what to show for the title of each result. It seems that what they are after is to ensure that titles are always as concise as possible, and as informative as possible.

Get rid of those boilerplate titles, titles which include your business name unnecessarily, keyword stuffed titles, duplicated titles, overly long titles, and titles which don’t really inform as to the content or purpose of the specific page.

If you found this blog post useful, please consider sharing it through Twitter, Facebook, or Google+. If you have any comments on any of these algorithmic changes, or feel that they help to explain any changes you have already been noticing, please leave your comments and thoughts below.

 

Google Publishes Advice On Effective Image Optimisation

Friday, May 4th, 2012

 

Is your website Googlebot-Image friendly?An aspect of SEO which I think we are all a little guilty of occasionally is to focus too much on text alone, overlooking the importance of image SEO. It is interesting to note that Google has recently published some information about the optimisation of images, but looking at the reactions and responses of many website publishers and SEO advisers it seems a little odd to me how many people have misunderstood one of the aspects of Google’s advice.

Although you may find that your website is mostly focused on delivering text based information to your visitors, there are many businesses which rely more heavily on image-based information. This could of course be graphical representations of data in the form of charts and infographics, visual-based representations of styles, furnishings and decorations, displays of food and drink, and even of course photographs demonstrating the sort of services offered by a photographer’s studio.

What Google has made clear in its recent publication is how important it is to make sure that any images which you include on your page, and which may be discovered by somebody carrying out a search online for images, are optimised appropriately and effectively.

So what image optimisation advice has Google offered?

First of all they have made it clear how important it is to ensure that any images embedded on the page are named appropriately, and that the alt attribute of the image describes it in a human friendly way. It is also important to make sure that the text content of the page is highly relevant to the image, and in particular text which is positioned very close to the image very closely relates to that image.

One point raised by Google is that whilst their Googlebot will crawl all of the text within your website, it will not crawl your images. Instead it will be Googlebot-Image which does this. It is therefore essential to make sure that you have allowed crawling of your images and your pages by both Googlebot and Googlebot-Image. It is also important to make sure that you include an image sitemap to assist with this, and you can get more information about creating image sitemaps here – http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=178636

Many people have been pleased to see that Google is paying close attention to the correct optimisation and use of the alt attributes, but in all of the information and advice provided by Google there is no mention of the title tag for images. This has led many people in discussions online to suggest that the title tag is no longer of any value.

I have been astonished to see so many people, including so-called SEO experts, suggest this. After all, even though the title tag for images may not be actively crawled by Googlebot-Image, it is important to remember that the title tag is something which will provide useful information to your visitors. Websites which are not user-friendly do not generally have as much success in generating loyalty and strengthening reputation, which means that the site is less likely to be visited less often, linked to less frequently and recommended less too, therefore generating fewer signals which could be interpreted by Google as meaning that your site is unpopular with real people.

In Summary!

So while making sure that you have named your images appropriately, including suitable alt text, included relevant text close to the image and ensured that your page can be crawled by both Googlebot and Googlebot image, as well as including an image sitemap, do not forget the fact that it is real people who will ultimately be the ones looking at your images, your links and your website.

Do you actively ensure that your images are optimised effectively? Have you found that your website generates a proportion of its traffic as a result of image searches rather than text based searches? Is this even something you have investigated? How important do you feel effectively optimised images are within your own businesses website? Please feel free to join in the discussion and leave your comments and thoughts in the box below, or share this post with your friends. :)

 

 

Image Credit: http://www.wirecase.com

Analysing Google’s Penguin Update In Practical Terms

Monday, April 30th, 2012

 

So finally we know where we’re going. It’s off from Asia and their pandas and on to the Antarctic to greet the penguins. If you have absolutely no idea what I’m on about then it is simply that Google has just announced the name of the new algorithmic changes they’ve rolled out, and which I’ve been discussing in this blog for the last week or two. First there was the Panda update, and now it is the Penguin update.

Google Penguin Update

I have been discussing on this blog ways in which it is likely to be advisable to adapt your web marketing and development strategies in order to safeguard your site’s current position and traffic. But until recently it was purely speculation and guesswork on my part, and on the part of all other SEO marketers I have been discussing it with.

But finally Google has released clear, precise and unequivocal advice on exactly how to survive the Penguin update. Matt Cutts and others have been very clear from the beginning that the Penguin update is specifically designed to minimise the visibility of websites within the search results that have achieved that position through underhand web spam techniques.

We are all fairly confident that we can spot a web spam, underhand or black hat technique, but how closely do our assumptions and beliefs match the statements released by Google? Let’s take a look at what Google has said what we should and shouldn’t be doing within our website marketing strategies.

Hidden Text Or Links

Unsurprisingly Google is very clear about this, stating that at no time should we ever include hidden text or hidden links within our websites. This isn’t news, and you may well be surprised to learn that there are still many website marketers using this technique. Reducing the size of your text so that it becomes so tiny it is virtually invisible, colouring your text white on a white background so that it is invisible, or including large chunks of text within ‘div’ tags so that is not rendered visible on the page are all techniques which should be avoided at any cost.

However, we know that some people will be concerned as to whether this also includes text which may be hidden within a tag such that when the reader clicks on a ‘Read more..’ link the section of text expands to reveal the remainder of that passage. This will not harm your website, as long as it is done in a reasonable way. For example, if you simply have one or two words, then a ‘Read more..’ link which reveals several hundred words this doesn’t suggest a reasonable balance.
However, if you have one or perhaps two paragraphs, with a ‘Read more..’ link that reveals another two or three paragraphs this is perfectly reasonable. If in any doubt, think about whether you are genuinely formatting the text for the benefit and convenience of real readers. If you are, then the chances are high that Google will appreciate that and you will not be penalised.

Cloaking And Redirects

Astonishingly there are still many webmasters who are using cloaking techniques, or automatic redirects so that in effect whenever a genuine visitor or search engine bot reaches the top level domain they are briefly confronted with a torrent of keyword rich text which is quickly replaced by a more reasonable homepage. This technique should be totally avoided, and there is no excuse for having a URL redirect within your meta tags which is virtually instant and provides no warning or explanation to the visitor.

Automated Google Queries

I suspect that this is something Google has been cracking down on increasingly over recent months as even I have sometimes found that when searching on Google I am redirected to a Captcha verification page because they suspect I may be a bot! Hopefully they have addressed this slight overreaction, but clearly they are making a statement that automated queries of any kind are absolutely not permitted. If these come from your own site in any way then fully expect your domain to be quickly penalised.

Irrelevant Keywords

A technique which some people seem to be using and which Google has not appreciated is creating pages full of what appears to be perfectly reasonable text, but which has completely irrelevant keywords, often turned into links, and these seem to be randomly inserted throughout the page. As an example, “clearly if you were cheap clock repairs a real reader you would notice a sentence which second-hand cars in Manchester didn’t seem to really make sense because it included random irrelevant words and phrases“! But this is exactly what some people are doing. If guilty, stop it. No excuses.

Duplicated Content Across Pages Or Domains

Again, this is something which I have recently mentioned in a previous blog post, highlighting the danger in having duplicated or very similar content included in different pages either within the same domain, across subdomains, or even across different domains altogether. Effectively this message is that you should be reducing your usage of content, and increasing the variety of fresh, original content. Good news for copywriters!

Affiliate Program Dangers

It seems that Google has picked up on the fact that a large number of people who have affiliate websites through which they are promoting and selling products and services under various affiliate schemes are failing to provide sufficient original and relevant content. Many of the websites which have suffered most as a result of Google’s Penguin update seem to be those which do not themselves offer any unique, original content or service, but which use a variety of marketing techniques to draw in traffic and then promote and sell products through affiliate links.

It is important if this is a technique or approach you have been using yourself to make sure that your website is bolstered with unique and original content which provides useful and relevant information. Again, it seems that the biggest winners as far as the Penguin update is concerned are the copywriters!

In summary then it would seem that the advice and recommendations I have been giving recently are pretty close to the mark. Reduce any duplicated or low value content, and increase the variety, relevance and quality of content on your website.

Has the Penguin update affected your website rank for traffic? Have you made any changes to your website or your SEO marketing in advance of or in response to the Penguin update? Share your thoughts and experiences by leaving a brief comment in the box below.

 

 

Image Credit: http://emieltenhoor.com

5 Ways To Protect Your Site From Google’s Over Optimisation Penalty

Tuesday, April 24th, 2012


Over the last couple of weeks I’ve written quite a lot about the forthcoming penalty which Google will be rolling out in a bid to quash the over optimisation which many Webmasters have been guilty of for some considerable time.

Whilst you may very well have never dabbled in black hat SEO, it is vital to appreciate that many techniques which may have been considered white hat are now distinctly grey, and when the penalty launches you could find your website heavily punished.

Make sure Google's penalty doesn't stop your website in its tracks

As well as being aware of what could potentially be construed as over optimisation, and the techniques which you should be avoiding from now on, it is also essential at this stage to have a look back at your own website and determine whether techniques you’ve never really considered potentially damaging might at this very moment be sharpening their teeth ready to bite you on the backside.

So today I’m going to be looking through some of the techniques and strategies which, whilst I have never recommended them, have not been considered dangerous techniques. Until now that it is, because it is perfectly possible that any one of the following optimisation techniques could result in your website disappearing from the search results at any time now.

Be under no illusion that Google is merely looking to eradicate overtly spam sites. Google’s over optimisation penalty could very well target websites which may largely be perfectly legitimate, but which have been integrating techniques which today are very unwise.

It’s also important to appreciate that today, in 2012, many of our websites have been around for years. Many perfectly legitimate websites today will have been founded either before the launch of Google, or within its first few years, when optimisation techniques were in their infancy. Such habits and practices can be hard to break, but what is harder still is to sit down and critically re-evaluate your existing content in the light of new understanding, and in the shadow of an oncoming threat.

Don’t leave it to chance, read through these tips, and if any of them apply to you, or you suspect that you may be guilty of one or more of these techniques, take action now. It isn’t known exactly when Google will launch its SEO penalty, but when it does you can be certain that by that time it will be too late to prevent your site from being very heavily punished.

Right then, here we go, my list of SEO techniques you should not only be avoiding, but completely removing from your website. You should also watch the video below by the mighty SEOMoz.

1. Unnatural Page Titles

The most significant factor which Google’s over optimisation penalty is likely to focus on is how content and the structure of that content compares to that which the average person is likely to produce. It is important therefore to think about optimising in a more natural way, rather than optimising for the sake of optimisation. Page titles are a good case in point.

For example, consider the following two page titles, and decide which one is more likely to be penalised by Google in the near future.

• Macclesfield Clock Repairs | Clock Repairs In Macclesfield | Clock Repair Services In Macclesfield
• J Turner & Son – Clock And Watch Repair Specialists In Macclesfield | Home

It isn’t hard to see how the first example has massively over optimised a variety of combinations of possible key phrase searches. If it is easy for you to tell at a glance which page title has been over optimised, you can be quite certain that Google will spot the difference just as quickly. So if you have incorporated multiple key phrases and combinations of those key phrases in your page titles then now is probably the ideal time to start making them more natural.

But in fact the problem goes further than this. Remember that when somebody searches in Google, it will be the page title that is the most prominent element of your page as it is listed in the search results. Whilst your current optimisation may well have resulted in your website being listed right at the top of the search results, a massively over optimised title could well harm your click-through rates.

The reason is that many people these days view overly optimised sites as being less reputable and valuable than those websites which appear more natural. The psychology is easy to understand, with more and more people starting to feel that if a website needs to over optimise in order to gain attention, there must be something wrong with it. Conversely, a website which appears to be more natural, and aimed at real people rather than algorithms is more likely to be clicked on in the search results, thus indirectly helping your rankings.

2. Duplicate Or Confusing Internal Links

It is by now well known that having duplicate anchor text links within your webpages offers no SEO value at all. If you have more than one identical anchor link on the page, only the first instance of this will be counted. Of course the subsequent examples will no longer merely be ignored, but may actually count against you.

There is nothing wrong with having multiple links to the same page or resource if it is relevant to do so, but it is important to make sure that not only is the anchor text you use different in each case, but that such links are created in a natural way, and not in a way which could be confusing.

Again, it is important to be aware of how real people are likely to react when they see a navigation menu or list of links which appear to be nearly identical. In our clock repair specialists example above it is easy to appreciate that the visitor to their sites may be somewhat confused and bamboozled if they are confronted with a list of links which look more like an entry from a thesaurus.

3. Link Filled Page Footers

Don’t ever believe that because your footer is hidden at the bottom of the page and infrequently viewed by visitors that it is a cunning location for sneaky links and optimisation. A footer which is stuffed full of semantically similar links using a variety of very similar key phrases is not only likely to put off your visitors should they do you the courtesy of scrolling down that far, but they are likely to be a real killer in the eyes of Google’s over optimisation penalty.

I have come across footers which are formatted in such a way that they veritably scream “Ignore me, I’m not here for you, I’m here for the search engines.” Masses of virtually identical links written in light grey text on a dark grey background are not going to do you any favours. Smarten up your footers, remove anything which is cluttering them or which is there purely to allow you to stuff an extra link or keyword in there, and don’t forget that these days it is important to make sure that in your footer you include clear links to things such as your privacy policy, terms of business and contact page, as well as the address of your business if you are aiming for localisation.

4. Pointless Text On Web Pages

Sometimes it can feel as though one of your web pages, though well structured and containing useful information, is missing something. Perhaps the page is dominated by images of products, product details, diagrams or maps. Perhaps you feel that this page is not going to grab the attention of the search engines unless there is a healthy chunk of text on it. You don’t really have anything particularly to say in addition to the information already displayed, but you plough ahead regardless creating a good chunk of text which more or less says nothing at all, has very little value, and is only there for the sake of the search engines.

If this sounds familiar then it’s probably a good idea to remove these pointless chunks of text. If they have been written solely for the purposes of the search engines then it is highly probable that the search engines will be able to tell this. Not only that, but your real visitors will also notice that there is something odd about it. If they start reading the text they may give up quite quickly deciding that it is pretty pointless, and they may even leave the page altogether as a result, in spite of the fact that actually the other content on the page was useful.

5. Semantically Similar Pages

One of the SEO tactics that a great many people have done, and which until very recently was not considered to be a particularly risky practice, is creating multiple semantically similar web pages. So for example, our clock repair specialists might have a few pages listed in their navigation menu as follows:

• Clock Repairs
• Watch Repairs
• Grandfather Clock Repairs
• Men’s Watch Repairs
• Ladies Watch Repairs
• Alarm Clock Repairs
• Macclesfield Clock Repairs
• Macclesfield Watch Repairs

You can see that at first glance it appears as though the website has a great deal of content, but exactly which link would you click on if your watch needed repairing, or your clock needed repairing? In either case you have several different choices, and this can be extremely confusing for your visitor. Confused visitors usually end up being customers for your rival. Not only will you put off real visitors, but with Google’s over optimisation penalty about to be launched anytime now, this is a practice which should be completely struck out.

Once again I should point out that at this stage Google has released no information whatsoever giving an indication of specific details relating to their over optimisation penalty. These suggestions are just that, my suggestions to you based on my understanding of the direction in which Google has been moving for quite some time now. This may well not be a definitive list, but it is a very sound place to start.

If you have any thoughts yourself about tactics which may well no longer be advisable, or you have any questions about over optimisation risks please leave your comments in the box below and we will aim to reply to all of them. If you found this post useful please consider sharing it via Twitter, Facebook or Google+ by using the share buttons above.

 

 

Google Over Optimisation Penalty – How To Adapt Your SEO Strategy

Monday, April 16th, 2012

 

I mentioned in a recent blog post that Google’s spokesperson, Matt Cutts, recently revealed that Google was about to crack down heavily on over optimisation. Whilst Google has not released any definite guidelines or advice in relation to this idea, it is worth starting to think now about what could be construed as over optimisation, and what tactics you should begin to reel in, or even eliminate altogether, as well as considering tactics which perhaps should be increased or emphasised.

The only real advice or clue offered by Matt Cutts at this stage is that Google will no longer be tolerating optimisation which goes beyond the level which might reasonably expected from an average individual or business. So what we need to consider is what Google might expect the average person to do, and what many people do which goes beyond that, and which might therefore result in a penalty.

Don't fall foul of Google's new SEO penalty

Generally speaking most people who create and develop an online presence start by building a website. The next thing they may do is to create some back links to this website, and then perhaps go on to promote it through social media. Over time most of the tweaks are going to be just that, fairly minor changes to things such as title tags, meta descriptions, and minor changes here and there.

The result of this is often that there will be an initial climb where measurable progress is seen, with a website rising up the search engine results pages, and increasing traffic. But eventually this progress will reach a plateau. For some people this will be as a perfectly acceptable level, but of course many people wish to go beyond this, and this is where many of the over optimisation techniques can creep in. So what techniques are often employed at this stage which may be no longer advisable?

Backlink Generation

The average person might be expected to generate a handful of links every so often, perhaps as a result of article marketing, blog posts being shared or a few directory listings. The problem is though that generating backlinks can be overdone.

Although nobody has any guaranteed answers at this stage it is safe to assume that Google is likely to become very suspicious if it sees hundreds or even thousands of backlinks generated in a very short space of time. It is unreasonable to expect the average person to be able to write and publish hundreds of articles per week.

It is therefore appropriate that at this stage you do not overdo your backlink generation. Throughout this blog I have frequently commented on the need to focus much more on quality than quantity, and I think that it is highly probable such an approach will be vital to avoid any potential penalties which Google’s new policy on over optimisation might enforce.

Duplicate Anchor Link Text

One of the clues which Google can use to identify spam link generation is duplicate anchor link text. If an article is published manually on a one by one basis then it is perfectly possible to alter the anchor link text each time. If you are still using inadvisable software which automatically submits, or rather spams, your articles to hundreds or thousands of directories then the result of this is likely to be a sudden influx of identical backlinks.

But quite apart from the fact that this offers a clue to Google that you could be overdoing your optimisation, it isn’t good SEO practice anyway. Make sure that you vary the anchor link text as much as possible, and don’t always assume that it is essential to have your keyword or key phrase links exactly the same way every time.

Limited Target Page Links

All too often SEO strategies can focus on promoting the home page of a website, yet this is another clue Google may well use in determining whether a website is over optimised or not. If the back links which Google finds link to a variety of different pages within your site then not only does this give a broader and more realistic impression of manual back linking and optimisation, but it also lends more weight to more of your website.

Let’s face it, your homepage is almost certainly one of the least important pages in your website. Yes, you did read that correctly. Although there are always exceptions, in many cases it is not the home page which provides detailed information, prices, order forms, contact pages, signup forms and other content which is likely to result in sales.

Make sure therefore that when you are generating links back to your website you include a variety of targets pages, and perhaps reduce the number of back links to the homepage.

If it helps, you can think of it a bit like this: if you were genuinely linking to somebody else’s website then it is more probable that you would be linking to a page which includes specific information, to which you may be referring, rather than simply directing people to the top level domain and hoping they’ll find their way from there.

Sudden Bursts

One of the biggest giveaways as far as over optimisation is concerned is the sudden appearance of massive bursts of activity, content or backlinks. The ordinary, average individual might well produce modest bursts of activity during the week, with a few posts, a handful of articles, and a sprinkling of back links.

But it isn’t reasonable to expect the average person to be able to generate hundreds or thousands of back links in a matter of days. Having said that there are always exceptions, and producing content which goes viral and is of course one of those exceptions. But Google is extremely good at telling the difference between content which has gone viral, and content which is simply being blasted out automatically in the form of spam.

It is therefore more appropriate perhaps to think about producing a steady stream of content and links rather than blasting out a massive amount every so often.

Rather than signing up with an SEO company which is able to generate hundreds or thousands of back links in a short space of time, think about working with SEO strategists who are able to produce a long-term consistent stream of content and links. This is a much better use of your money, and appears much more natural, making sure that you are not penalised for over optimising.

Minimal Social Media Activity

There is often a very good reason why many SEO service providers do not place a significant emphasis on social media. The reason is simply that this takes time, and it is very hard to automate in a way which appears natural. This is why many of the less advisable SEO companies pay scant attention to social media, placing the emphasis almost entirely on generating links through other means, from article marketing, forum posting, blog posting, blog commenting and directory listings.

Whilst there is nothing wrong with any of these forms of marketing, it is important today to think about making sure you deliver the right balance. Google has made it clear already that they are placing much more weight on the signals generated through social media than they ever have done before, and for this reason I would strongly advise that you decrease your other forms of marketing and address the balance if your use of social media marketing has been relatively poor.

Greater Emphasis On Promotion Than Development

Almost certainly one of the biggest factors which Google will be able to use when determining if someone is over optimising their content is whether the emphasis is on the promotion of existing content, rather than on the development of new content.

A lot of the signals given by Google in recent times seem to strongly suggest that the development of new content and new resources is much more important than the promotion of existing content which has already been crawled, seen and listed. I would suggest that now is the time to reduce your promotion of existing content.

Instead of spending an hour a day promoting your existing content, do this just once a week. Spend around half of the time each week developing new content, either web pages, resources, E books, infographics or blog posts, and spend all of the remaining time sharing, commenting and engaging in social media.

Of course, there is absolutely no reason why you still can’t promote existing content whilst at the same time developing new content. For example, it may be the case that whilst writing a new, fresh blog post it is appropriate and relevant to refer to (via a link!) a previous blog post you may have written some time ago.

That is absolutely fine, and not only does it help link to existing content, but it also tells Google that the old content is still relevant and important. After all, if you never feel the need to refer to your old content whilst developing new content, does that not imply that the old content is no longer relevant? Don’t overdo this of course, but it is a tactic which I believe important to include where appropriate.

Of course all of these strategies and recommendations are based on my own personal feeling after carrying out a good deal of research and engaging with other SEO professionals. I must make it clear at this stage that Google has not released any specific advice, recommendations or warnings, nor have they given any indication when, or even if they ever will.

But having said that all of these strategies are highly advisable given the updates we are already aware of. Incorporating these strategies and making these adaptations to your existing SEO strategy is likely to give your site the best chance of being discovered, promoted up the search results, and receiving high levels of targeted traffic.

But finally I would also offer this one caveat: never, ever optimise exclusively for what you believe the search engines are after. Remember, the search engines are only there to serve. Your content should be always targeted directly at the needs of your intended audience. Put your efforts into generating valuable content that your target audience actually wants, and you’re most of the way towards success with the search engines as well.

If you found this post useful, please consider sharing it through Twitter, Facebook or Google+ using the share buttons at the top of the page. If you have any comments about Google’s suggestion that we should be careful not to over optimise our content, please do so using the comments section below.

 

Image Credit: http://www.bowlerhat.co.uk

4 Tips For Creating High Quality Content And Articles

Tuesday, April 3rd, 2012

 

I have often talked in previous blog posts about the importance of good quality web content, and the importance of article marketing within the context of today’s increasingly cynical and sophisticated search engines. From blogging and article writing to web content development, the one thing which underpins the vast majority of online marketing today is the written word.

But whilst it’s easy to talk about how important it is to produce good quality content, many people struggle when they come to sit down in front of their computer and stare blankly at a bare white screen with an irritating blinking cursor daring them to commit their wild and random thoughts to meaningful text.

Creating content, articles and blog posts for 2012

So I thought for a change it would be helpful today to look at a few of the techniques which you can employ when it comes to creating SEO articles or web content in order to help both the creative process, and the effectiveness of the end result. It is one thing to get going when it comes to writing good quality content for the web, but quite another to make sure that what you are writing is worth the space on the screen.

1. Know Your Audience

One of the biggest hurdles many people face when it comes to writing articles or blog posts is the fact that they don’t have a very clear idea of who it is they are writing for. Clearly if you are writing to your bank manager you will apply a different style and tone of emphasis than if you’re writing to your dear Aunt Maud, and this is very true for web content.

Try brainstorming a few keywords relating to the sort of person you are trying to target. Think about their age, background, professional experience, occupation, location, needs and so on. A big problem for many people is that the audience is invisible. Often they never even meet a single one of the people they are writing for, and this can easily give writing an impersonal feel.

One little trick that you can try if you feel this is a problem is to have a quick look online for an image of someone who seems to represent the sort of target audience you are trying to write for. Print off this picture, and tape it next to your monitor. Try to explain your ideas whilst looking at a photograph of this person. This may well help to improve the clarity and effectiveness of your descriptions and explanations, as well as helping to keep a tighter focus.

2. Know Your Audience’s Needs

People are busy, and are unlikely to spend much time reading web content or articles that have no direct value to them personally. You might think that what you are writing is useful and informative, and it may well be, but if it doesn’t directly inform or provide value to the people you are trying to target then it is unlikely to be read, linked to, shared or otherwise used in a way you are hoping for.

It is helpful therefore to make a list of the sorts of problems or questions to which your target audience is trying to find answers. You might even find that a search online in forums or even on Twitter for keywords relating to your topic reveal the sorts of questions and concerns people have at the moment. It is important to make sure that your content or your articles address these specific questions or problems, and of course it is important that people can see at a glance what it is you are offering. This is why clear, accurate titles are so essential.

3. Title First Or Articles First?

Many article writers and web content developers are split between deciding whether to write the title first, or write the content and then think of a suitable title afterwards. This same question is even raised when writing short stories and even novels, often with authors having a working title which is then changed once the book is complete.

I think that the best approach is to have a title right from the start, because this helps lend focus to your writing. It easy for web content and SEO articles to become fluffy and vague, going off on tangents that end up leaving the reader feeling as though they’re on a content Safari rather than a clean and purposeful journey with a specific goal.

But whilst having a title right from the start is important, there is also no harm in revisiting this title once you have completed your article and assessing whether perhaps it could be improved or altered. I would also strongly recommend that if your article or web page is going to exceed 300 or 400 words in length that you also incorporate working subtitles. This helps to ensure that your content is structured as well as having a defined purpose.

4. Semantic Language

Obviously keywords are no longer something which we should be focusing on when creating articles, blog posts or web pages, although inevitably you will want to get specific key phrases incorporated in titles and subheadings. But it is also essential to consider the vocabulary you use throughout your content. If the only contextually relevant words you use are tightly focused to the specific keyword or key phrase you’re wanting to optimise your content for then you are unlikely to endear yourself in the eyes of the great god Google.

The best thing to do is to create a list of words which relate to the subject you are about to write about. So if you were to write an article about playing cards your list of relevant vocabulary is likely to include words such as pack, deck, suits, hands, hearts, clubs, spades, diamonds, jokers, box, games, shuffle, deal and so on.

It is all too easy when writing blog posts or SEO articles to become lazy, and to use pronouns rather than the actual words you mean. So in our example above, rather than saying something like “Dish them out to people and then ask everyone to look at them” say “Deal the cards to the players and then ask them to look at the faces” – you see how in one sentence we’ve managed to incorporate three semantically relevant words?

Incidentally, did you notice the word cloud above? That was generated directly from this blog post. Can you see how the semantic language has been incorporated naturally into this text? That’s what helps to make sure it gets picked up and noticed by the search engines, yet it all sounds perfectly natural, without any forced language at all. This is how writing in 2012 needs to be.

Creating good quality content these days is so important, and if you feel that it is going to take you too much of your time to come up with suitable articles or blog posts then it is usually beneficial to enlist the services of a professional copywriter with experience of creating this sort of content.

If you have any questions or comments, or need further help with developing content for today’s demanding web then either get in touch, or feel free to leave a comment below, and we will do our best to help.

 

Google +1x = More Power To The Power Of One

Thursday, March 29th, 2012

With Google announcing on Friday the launch of the latest Panda update, dubbed Panda 3.4, it is clear to everyone that sitting still is the best way to move very quickly. Down.

 

Google+1 icons

Google’s latest algorithmic changes will affect 1.6% of queries, which may not sound an awful lot until you realise that with Google serving up 3 billion searches a day that’s 48 million searches affected on a daily basis (or 555 affected searches every second!)

All of which can be very daunting for anyone looking to start up a new business, or expand an existing high street business into the online world. For those of us who have been working online for many years there are clear advantages, such as domain age and established resources which have accumulated many links and much authority. But for anyone starting out it is hopelessly overwhelming.

Even for those who may not have really invested fully in online marketing, and who are just now realising that more needs to be done, the challenge seems utterly hopeless.

What’s the point of competing with huge established businesses which dominate the search results?

Surely there’s just no way for any newcomer to make a name for themselves, to achieve online success in the face of these behemoths of the digital age?

And yet, as search moves forwards, as Google rolls out yet more updates, there is a clear message here. For those who have large, lumbering online presences the regular updates, changes and opportunities can be hard to adapt to very quickly, whereas newcomers can find themselves riding a wave that many longstanding businesses have missed.

More than that, because as SEO continues to change, and social media marketing becomes an ever stronger and more effective facility for online marketing, there are opportunities to achieve phenomenal success.

Perhaps it is of particular interest that Google decided to announce the launch of its latest Panda release through Twitter. That says a good deal, and has got a lot of people talking. Make no mistake, Google very much has social media firmly targeted, and is making sure it plays an increasingly important role.

Which is of course where Google+ comes in. Whilst some people wondered if Google+ would just be another Buzz, a failed attempt to take on existing social media platforms, the ‘plus one’ feature is clearly here to stay, and is having a massive impact on the search results.

But do you fully realise how much of an impact the Google +1 button is making?

And how much more of an impact those +1′s are having now with the release of the latest Panda update?

I wrote recently about how to maximise the effectiveness of your SEO through personalised search, and this is now very much an area which everyone needs to focus on. Not to the exclusion of standard SEO, but definitely as a significant element within your overall SEO strategy.

True, Google+ is still seeming to play second fiddle to Facebook and Twitter in the social media stakes, but that’s not where it ends by far. Perhaps you may have noticed that some searches now include G+ posts alongside the standard results. These standard web search results are now including a growing number of G+ related content, from authorships and +1′s to shares and even Google Circle statistics. Make no mistake, G+ is here to stay, and it’s affecting search results in a big way.

So what about those business owners looking to get started in SEO and online marketing, or take the next step? How does Google+ fit into their plans?

Here’s the thing. As I’ve mentioned before, if you operate within a community niche trying to get your site to the top of the search results  is now largely meaningless. With personalised search, we’re all going to see wildly different results anyway. What’s important now is to make sure that you get your website to the top of the personalised results of those people you’re trying to target.

And this is where Google+ steps neatly into the frame. Because anything you write, publish or share may now very likely appear in the search results of those people following you. That means that all your followers are now much more likely to see any of your content appear high up their search results, just because they follow you. In other words, one of the quickest ways of getting to the top of the search results is to have followers on Google+, and to make sure your content is shared.

Of course, this means that the more followers you have the more people will see your content appearing high up their search results, and so one of your priorities right now must be to increase the number of followers you have. Hold a competition, give a free ebook away or provide some other valuable service available only to those who are following your Google+ profile.

But even more than this, if one of those people who follows you sees the content you’ve published or shared, which they are highly likely to, and they decide it is worth sharing, then all of their followers will now be able to see your content prioritised too if they carry out a relevant Google Social Search. So having 1,000 followers, each with 1,000 followers means your content could be actively promoted to the top of the results for a million people. Not only that, those 1,000,000 people are more likely to have an interest in your content, since they follow people who follow you, or they follow you directly.

So the message is clear. It is not too late to make huge strides in online marketing. Anyone can get their website and content high up the search results. But right now the best way of achieving this is to focus on increasing your Google+ followers, sharing as much of your content as possible through Google+, and slapping +1 links everywhere you can find a few spare pixels’ worth of space.

For more SEO and online marketing advice please follow me on Twitter and Facebook, and of course, join me on Google+.
 

 
Image Credit: http://www.freeiconsweb.com

Forget The Panda Update – Here Comes The Human Algorithm

Tuesday, March 27th, 2012

Here’s a new way to think about Google. Imagine it not as an almost endless bank of high powered servers blasting endlessly through tens of thousands of horribly complex algorithms, but instead, sitting back in a pair of chinos and a polo shirt, a warm mug of coffee and a plate of chocolate digestives by its side.

The Google of the future?

Google’s Matt Cutts was recently asked what Google is currently doing to try to avoid delivering search results which include sites saturated with highly optimised content. The problem is that many people feel that businesses with large SEO budgets have an unfair advantage over small businesses which are simply doing a damn fine job of delivering genuinely useful content to their readers, and don’t have the time, expertise or budget to be able to massively optimise everything they do.

Matt Cutts’ response surprised quite a lot of people. He stated quite plainly that websites would now be penalised if in their search optimisation and search engine marketing they go beyond what a ‘normal’ person might be expected to do.

What he isn’t saying here of course is that optimisation is dead. What he is saying though, and quite rightly, is that over optimisation is no longer appropriate. Gone are the black hats of rogue optimisation, but the time has come to have a second look at some of those old white hats, because a few have now gathered enough dust to make them more than a little grey.

Is it time to reassess those white hat strategies?

There are three things to consider here. Firstly, Google is now getting astonishingly clever with its semantic searching and indexing, able to analyse web content in a way that is extremely close to how real people read and analyse pages. This means that optimising for bots is more easily identifiable, and likely to result in penalties being enforced.

Secondly, with Apple’s Siri companion available on the iPhone, and with Google Assistant shortly to be released on Android devices, we are gradually moving into an age of search where we are expecting to be able to interact and communicate with computers in a more intuitive and natural way. That word ‘communicate’ is probably important – imagine that you aren’t going to be ‘using’ Google in the future, but ‘communicating’ with it.

Thirdly, Google has been very aware for years that every time they implement a new change to their algorithms, SEO experts will immediately begin analysing data to establish what has changed, and how strategies need to be adapted. This has inevitably resulted in the over optimisation of content, and this can mean that poorer quality content can be pushed to the top of the results, drowning content which may actually be fantastic, but is not brilliantly optimised. This latest move from Google looks set to introduce a new period in which search doesn’t just become personalised, it’s almost becoming a person.

Do you think it is right that Google should now be penalising over optimisation? What do you understand over optimisation to be? Do you see a time when we will be communicating with Google rather than simply using it as a tool, and do you think this is the right direction for search? Please leave your comments in the box below or share this post using the buttons above.
 

Image Credit: http://www.themightierpen.co.uk

Facebook
Twitter
Read Our Blog
Testimonials
LinkedIn
Request a Quote